|
|
A letter from
Jon Inskeep (page 3) to the Baltimore Sun
in reply to an
editorial about the Supreme Court
July 2, 2001
Dear Editor:
Although I welcome your front page story on the growing controversy
surrounding the Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore, your columnist
makes several serious errors which cannot go unchallenged.
Mr. Healy says that the public doesn't care about the decision,
without citing any poll or other data to support his claim. His
apparent source? He read it in his own column. If he had made even
a modest attempt to determine true public opinion he would know
that citizens everywhere remain disgusted by the blatantly political
power grab exercised by the Court.
Mr. Healy goes on to say that the precedent set by the decision
is insignificant because it only applies to this one case. Wrong
again. If the decision is allowed to stand, all future Courts retain
the right to appoint the President of the United States, in open
violation of the US Constitution.
Finally, Mr. Healy ignores the overwhelming condemnation of the
case by lawyers, laymen, authors, and citizens, and instead cites
Richard A. Posner as the "most influential" lawyer in the country,
ignoring two facts: Judge Posner is an apologist for the extreme
right; and, even he rejected outright the majority opinion of the
Court and only attempts to rationalize the decision based on narrow
grounds supported by only three of the Justices. Even Robert Bork,
rejected by the US Senate for his extreme right positions, condemned
the decision!
Buried well down in the article Mr. Healy finally acknowledges that
673 law professors of all political persuasions have publicly and
repeatedly condemned the decision. The truth is, virtually no one
can or will publicly defend this horrific assault on democracy.
In the words of the senior Mr. Bush spoken in a different context:
"This will not stand!"
Jonathan Inskeep
Crofton, MD

If you are interested in joining the majority
fringe, please click on the 'join the fringe' button for more information.
|